OK a slight curveball here. We all know that payday loans fill a gap in the market for consumers with short time financial difficulty, making it possible to obtain small amounts of cash quickly and simply, with no need for credit checks or long and complicated application processes. But do they do more harm than good? Never to be one to shy away from what is really important or on the lips of those that oppose the payday loan concept, we decided to tackle it head on. KAAAHHPLOW!
What seems to be the problem here then?
These loans are given out freely with loan companies not making stringent checks on a customer’s credit history or current financial situation, they are increasingly offered to high risk customers, and those already experiencing serious debt problems.
Number 1
Customers in this situation are already clearly not managing their money effectively, and are far more likely to default on their loans, or fall into a vicious circle of debt. Missing repayments means that the added interest and penalty charges can lead to a customer paying the total cost of their payday loan multiple times over, and in a situation where a customer could not afford to pay off the original balance in full in the first place – this just worsens an already sometime desperate situation.
Number 2
Some payday loans companies are unregulated, not us! Meaning the consumer is not protected by the law, and allows the lenders to employ sometimes brutal tactics for getting their money back, leaving customers in severe emotional as well as financial stress.
Step forth the lobbyists
It is with this in mind that many lobbyists have called for payday loans to be banned altogether. This has in turn led many in power; including MP’s and the credit advisers Consumer Focus, to warn that this would just lead to high risk customers being forced to turn to illegal loan sharks in order to obtain cash at short notice – a far more dangerous practice than borrowing from well known and regulated payday loans services. Consumer Focus have suggested a tightening of the rules surrounding payday loans, making them more difficult to obtain for customers with already quite serious debt problems, making the loans work more effectively and safeguarding the customers taking them out.
Some suggestions
Among the rules suggested by Consumer Focus is a limit of 5 payday loans per household per year. Experts have already suggested that payday loans customers should seek financial advice if they need to take out more than three payday loans in any one year, so this advice would just mean payday loans companies would be required to direct customers to independent debt advisers should they reach their yearly limit.
Payday loans companies should also share information between them, preventing borrowers from taking out more than one payday loan at a time – one of the most easy ways to fall into a debt trap using payday loans. Payday lenders should perform more stringent checks on customers to ensure that they are able to make repayments in full on their next payday, meaning they will not be affected by the high APRs and devastating penalty charges which inevitably lead to the cycle of debt.
So, should instant loans online be banned?
Payday loans do fill an essential gap in the financial market, and if used responsibly can be a helpful avenue for those with short term financial difficulties. If customers are aware of the situation they are putting themselves in, and are certain they can meet repayments in full on their next payday, there should be no call for payday loans to be banned. However, and there is always a however in most fair arguments, there should be tighter restrictions in place to make sure that vulnerable customers do not get themselves into a worse financial situation just through desperation.

Payday loans can be a quick fix in a difficult financial situation. They are offered to anyone with an income, deposited into your account almost instantaneously and are easily available. The problems with the cash advance loan online arises when a customer is unable to meet the repayments in full, leading to high rates of accrued interest and large penalty charges, meaning even less chance of the customer managing the repayment the following month. Taking out multiple payday loans increases this risk hugely.

Payday loans companies need to charge interest at this level because the loans are repaid in such a short space of time. If a customer were to take out a £100 loan over the space of a year, at an interest rate of 20% (already quite a high rate of interest), the amount they will have paid back by the end of the year would be £120. However, if this loan was taken out only for one month, the repayment amount would only be £101.67, at a profit to the company of £1.67. Although rates as low as these would make payday loans far more popular, it is doubtful that the companies would be able to stay afloat on such a small amount of profit per customer.
Consumer Focus found that this method of lending is increasingly popular with young business people, with a majority of borrowers being under 35, single and with no children. They tend to borrow in order to fill a shortfall in their wages and to fulfill short term needs, rather than more long term investments, and almost 70% have an income that falls below the national average of £25000 p.a. Most borrowers are repeat borrowers, a situation which has caused concern among
Payday loans are a simple and easy way of bridging the gap when an unexpected expense crops up between pay days. They are far safer (and legal) than borrowing from a loan shark, and have much less impact on your long term financial situation than taking out a long term loan, credit card, or going into an unauthorised overdraft. If the interest rate is manageable and the company verified, they can be an extremely positive solution to those going through a brief period of financial difficulty. They are not, however, a solution to long term debt or severe money struggles. In those cases you are better off speaking to your bank, or visiting a 
While buy-now-pay-later systems are a great way of minimising the delay in obtaining a product, they often involve rather steep interest charges as a fee for using the service. Quite often, it is possible to pay an additional 50% of the item’s worth on top of the RRP which somewhat dilutes the appeal of the process. Furthermore, the general requirement for a high level of credit worthiness excludes a vast number of potential buyers from such schemes, leaving many with little option other than to save up or go without. That is of course, unless a payday lender is sought for a
Historically speaking, lending services requiring no confirmation as to an applicant’s financial past were as rare as the proverbial hen’s teeth to put it mildly. Generally speaking, unless you were already in a reasonably comfortable financial situation, the chances of securing a loan were akin to those of winning the lottery; slim to none in other words. On one hand this is understandable, as certain logic dictates it wise to only loan money to those with a proven history of meeting repayments. On the other hand however, what about the huge number of potential borrowers who may have faced hardship in the past but could easily meet repayment terms today? Indeed, more sensible logic suggests that each case be considered individually on its own merit, ideally in the form of loans without credit checks.
The ability to take out 
